Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43207 (MAD)

G.DEVA v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/7894/2026 · 2026-07-02

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.7894 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.7894 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.8546 of 2026 G.Deva S/o. N. Gurupadham, C-50, Plaza Manor Flat, No.1, Karumari Amman Koil Street, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026 Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Deputy Commissioner/ Executive Officer Vadapalani Murugan Temple, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026. 3.The Fit Person Vadapalani Murugan Temple, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026. Respondents ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7894 of 2026 PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from undertaking or proceeding with any civil works which are not in consonance with Sections 35, 36, 66, and 86 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 in Arulmigu Vadapalani Andavar Temple, Chennai, including the proposed repair and renovation of Shri Valli Thirumana Mandapam. For Petitioner: Mr.Vadiraj Anirudh.S.G. (Through Video Conferencing) For Respondents: Mr.P.V.Balasubramainam Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.D.Yashwanth Rajan Government Counsel for R1 and R3 Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan for R2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This writ petition, styled as public interest litigation, has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7894 of 2026 undertaking or proceeding with any civil works which are not in consonance with Sections 35, 36, 66 and 86 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 in Arulmigu Vadapalani Andavar Temple, Chennai, including the proposed repair and renovation of Shri Valli Thirumana Mandapam. 2. The second respondent has filed a counter-affidavit, wherein, it is stated as under: “8. ….. At present, the Mandapam after renovation will be strictly used as a multipurpose hall for propagation of religious tenets, promotion of fine Arts and functions propagating the Hindu culture and other religious purposes connected with Hindu Religion. ….” 3. Learned Additional Advocate General submitted that, after renovation, the Mandapam will be strictly used as multi-purpose hall for propagation of religious tenets, promotion of fine arts and functions propagating the Hindu culture and other religious purposes connected with Hindu religion only. 4. Recording the submission made by learned Additional Advocate General, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7894 of 2026 order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 02.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To: 1.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Deputy Commissioner/ Executive Officer Vadapalani Murugan Temple, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026. 3.The Fit Person Vadapalani Murugan Temple, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7894 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbr W.P.No.7894 of 2026 02.07.2026 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis