IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85225 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2024 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vikash kumar @ Vikas S/O Baidhanath Paswan R/O Village - Kushaiya Rampur Kusahia,Word.No. 07, P.S. Warisnagar, District Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. X D/O Brahm Devdas R/O Vill.- Chhatwari,Ward No.- 04, P.S- Ujyarpur, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 31-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Musarigharari P.S. Case No. 186 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 6 and 12 of the POCSO Act. 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on 06.08.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 27225 of 2025 which reads as follows:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85225 of 2025(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 connection with Musarigharari P.S. Case No. 186 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6, 12 of the POCSO Act. 3. As per the case zero FIR has been launched at New Delhi by the victim herself, the petitioner on the pretext of love affair obtained naked photograph of the victim during the Whatsapp video call. 4. The video of the intimate moments of the petitioner and the victim have been produced by the victim girl duringinvestigation. The Petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2025. 5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the nature of the accusation, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby dismissed. 4. The charges have been framed and the trial has started. This Court finds no ground to review its earlier order. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T