Dhamodharaswamy Sulochana ,Sole Proprietor of Mayurra Travels v. The State Tax Officer
WP/23505/2026 · 2026-07-01
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43179 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43179 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 23505 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23505 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.25480 & 25481 of 2026 Dhamodharaswamy Sulochana ,Sole Proprietor of Mayurra Travels 13/5, Indra Nagar, New Scheme Road,Sidhapudur, Coimbatore,Tamil Nadu - 641015. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer P.N.Palayam Assessment Circle, coimbatore. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records leading to the issuance of assessment order bearing reference GSTIN 33CHAPS026SK1Z9/2021-22 dated 10.12.2025 by the Respondent herein and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Chandrika B For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ****** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23505 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
ORDER An order dated 10.12.2025 is challenged on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to submit supporting documents.
2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the show cause notice was replied to by the petitioner and that the petitioner had requested for time because the auditor was unavailable and the ticket booking platform had not provided the requisite details to the petitioner. Without prejudice, learned counsel submits that the petitioner agrees to remit a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- towards the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle.
4. Subject to the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- towards the disputed tax demand within sixty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order, the impugned order is set aside so as to provide another opportunity to the petitioner to submit documents to establish that the supplies were exempted. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23505 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 issued within three months from the date of remittance of Rs.15,00,000/- towards the disputed tax demand.
5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 01-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The State Tax Officer P.N.Palayam Assessment Circle, coimbatore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 23505 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 23505 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.25480 & 25481 of 2026 01-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis