IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86419 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2025 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Vinod Kumar Singh S/O Late Uchait Singh R/O Village - Kakna, P.S- Pandaul, Distt.- Madhubani 2. Man Singh S/O Ramesh Singh R/O Village - Kakna, P.S- Pandaul, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Kusum Rani For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that while he was coming back home from his field on 13.03.2025 at 11.30 A.M., when he was intercepted by the accused persons and on orders of petitioner no.1, accused Man Singh (petitioner no.2) assaulted him by khanti, but Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86419 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 informant held the blow, thereafter again he assaulted causing injury on lips, thereafter Dinesh assaulted his brother Kamlesh by farsa causing injury on head. Further, Saroj assaulted Vimlesh by khanti causing injury on lips and his two teeth broke and thereafter accused entered his house and Dinesh committed theft of Rs.30,000/- and injured were taken to the hospital. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant (Vimlesh Kumar Singh). It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner no.1 is alleged to be an order giver while petitioner no.2 is alleged to have assaulted the informant by khanti causing injury on lips and the injury suffered by the informant has been opined to be simple, but then, injury suffered by Kamlesh has been opined to be grievous, but then, accused Dinesh is alleged to have assaulted Kamlesh. It is also submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is further submitted that from the side of the petitioners also, Pandaul P. S. Case No. 55 of 2025 has been instituted against the informant and his side. It is next submitted that petitioners are not criminals. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86419 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with G.R. No.568 of 2025 arising out of Pandaul P. S. Case No.56 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T