IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3053 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2011 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Vinod Chaudhary @ Rama Kant Choudhary S/o Late Buchchi Choudhary R/o Village- Parsarma, PS- Biroul, Distt- Darbhanga 2. Chhote Choudhary @ Chhotu Choudhary S/o Late Buchchi Choudhary R/o Village- Parsarma, PS- Biroul, Distt- Darbhanga 3. Ramshish Choudhary S/o Late Ram Gulam Choudhary R/o Village- Parsarma, PS- Biroul, Distt- Darbhanga 4. Brij Mohan Ram @ Braj Mohan Ram S/o Saryug Ram R/o Village- Parsarma, PS- Biroul, Distt- Darbhanga 5. Dhirendra Mahto S/o Late Suraj Mahto R/o Village- Parsarma, PS- Biroul, Distt- Darbhanga 6. Dilip Choudhary @ Dilip Kumar Chaudhary S/o Late Chandra Choudhary R/o Village- Parsarma, PS- Biroul, Distt- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Dr Abdus Shakoor For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 7 17-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per F.I.R., allegation against petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons killed informant's elder brother and without giving information to anybody, cremated his dead body with intention to conceal the evidence. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in-laws family members of the deceased. There is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3053 of 2025(7) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 no eye-witness to the occurrence and only on suspicion, petitioners and others have been made accused in this case. As a matter of fact, the deceased died due to consumption of excessive liquor. Police, after investigation, submitted final form against petitioners, however, differing with the same, learned Trial Court took cognizance against all the accused persons. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biroul, District - Darbhanga in connection with Biroul P.S. Case No. 117 of 2011, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T