Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43115 (KAR)

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. ROOPA PRAKASH G

MFA/1137/2014 · 2026-09-28

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010078212014 NC: 2026:KHC:53532 MFA No. 1137 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1137 OF 2014 (MV) BETWEEN: THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE-I THEJAS COMPLEX SAYYAJI RAO ROAD MYSORE - 570 001. …APPELLANT [BY SRI MURALIDHAR K., ADVOCATE FOR (VC) SRI A RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE] AND: 1. ROOPA PRAKASH G., S/O LATE GANESHLAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS NO.393, MOSQUE ROAD NAZARBAD, MYSORE - 570 001. 2. VIAJAYA RAGHAVAN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O C G PANDITH NATHAN MAHAVIR AGENCY, C C ROAD LASHKAR MOHALLA MYSORE - 570 001. 3. B.VADIVELAN S/O LATE BALAKRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.287/A, 5TH B CROSS, 1ST STAGE, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010078212014 NC: 2026:KHC:53532 MFA No. 1137 of 2014 GAYATHRIPURAM, MYSORE -570 001. …RESPONDENTS [V/C/O DATED 29.07.2024 - APPEAL AGAINST R1 IS DISMISSED AS ABATED; V/C/O DATED 11.07.2024 - SERVICE OF NOTICE FOR R2 IS H/S; V/C/O DATED 21.09.2026 - APPEAL AGAINST R3 IS STAND DISMISSED] THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.11.2007 PASSED IN MVC NO.379/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE & MEMBER, MACT, MYSORE, DISMISSING CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT By order dated 21.09.2026, appeal was dismissed against respondent no.3. Appeal was earlier dismissed as abated against respondent no.1-claimant. Though learned counsel for appellant submitted that appeal is on liability and would survive against respondent no.2-owner, said submission does not appear justified. Hence, appeal is dismissed in its entirety. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3