Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43082 (PAT)

Santu Noniya @ Santu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./86214/2025 · 2026-01-20

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86214 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1. Santu Noniya @ Santu Kumar S/O Bir Bahadur Noniya R/O Village - Nawada Ben, P.S- Udwantnagar, Distt.- Bhojpur 2. Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Noniya S/O Suresh Noniya R/O Village - Nawada Ben, P.S- Udwantnagar, Distt.- Bhojpur 3. Babi Devi W/O Sobhnath Noniya R/O Village - Nawada Ben, P.S- Udwantnagar, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 20-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126, 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.3 is a woman and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioners on 30.04.2025 at 6.00 P.M. came on account of dispute amongst children and mother along with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86214 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026 2/2 Amit assaulted him and his family members and thereafter Amit along with other accused persons assaulted his family members. 4. Learned counsel submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No.218/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T