Lakshmi Narayana Prathypati v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/456/2018 · 2026-06-29
V Sujatha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4307 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4307 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010000642018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 456/2018 Between:
1. LAKSHMI NARAYANA PRATHYPATI, S/O.DR. P.SUNDER RAO, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC- ADVOCATE, R/O.203, SAI SHARAN APARTMENTS, BASKHAR RAO NAGAR COLONY, BASKHAR RAO NAGAR COLONY HYD
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT,, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR
2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 VS,J W.P.No.456 of 2018
5. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
6. THE SPECIAL OFFICER, URBAN LAND CEILING AUTHORITY, DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE, MAIN ROAD, KRISHNA NAGAR, MAHARANI PETA, VISAKHAPATNAM -530 002, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE SPECIAL OFFICER URBAN LAND CEILING, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD
8. M/S ECE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, (A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956), WITH REGD. OFFICE AT ECE HOUSE, 28-A, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI 110001, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 9. M/S LAKSHMI TECHNO SOLUTIONS P LTD, ( A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT), REGISTERED OFFICE AT NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to provide certified copies of the Adangals in respect of Property bearing Sy.Nos. 57/3, 4 ,5 and Sy.No.58, Sy.No.59/1,2 and 3, Sy.No.66/1 to 4 and Sy.No.58/1 of Marripalem Village, Visakhapatnam Urban and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and Sy.Nos.41/1 and 41/2 of Kapparada Village for the years 1959, 1960, 1961 to 1965 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondent No.2 to seek a report from the Respondent No.3 regarding the disappearance of the Adangals in respect of Property bearihg Sy.Nos.
57/3, 4 &5, Sy.No.58, Sy.No.59/1,2&3, Sy.No.66/1 to 4 and Sy.No.58/1 of Marripalem Village, Visakhapatnam Urban and Mandal,
3 VS,J W.P.No.456 of 2018
Visakhapatnam District and Sy.Nos.41/1 and 41/2 of Kapparada Village for the years 1959, 1960, 1961 to 1965, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 30-1-2018 in WP.No.456 of 2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased allow the petition to set aside the dismissal orders dated 07.11.2025 to restore the writ petition proceedings vide W.P. No. 456/2018 which was dismissed for non-prosecution to provide a genuine opportunity to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to order dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the
order dated 07.11.2025 in W.P. No. 456/2018 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRABHAKAR SRIPADA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A CHANDRA SHAKER
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. C HANUMANTHA RAO The Court made the following:
4 VS,J W.P.No.456 of 2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following prayer:
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to provide certified copies of the Adangals in respect of Property bearing Sy.Nos. 57/3, 4 ,5 and Sy.No.58, Sy.No.59/1,2 and 3, Sy.No.66/1 to 4 and Sy.No.58/1 of Marripalem Village, Visakhapatnam Urban and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and Sy.Nos.41/1 and 41/2 of Kapparada Village for the years 1959, 1960, 1961 to 1965 and pass…”
2. The petitioner submitted an application dated 03.02.2016 under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, before the respondent No.5 seeking certified copies of old adangals pertaining to different survey numbers situated in Marripalem village, Visakhapatnam urban and mandal, Visakhapatnam district. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent authorities in supplying the said certified copies, the petitioner filed appeals before the State Information Commissioner vide S.No.9252 and 9269/CIC-MR/2016, wherein, an order was passed on 26.05.2016 directing the 5th respondent herein to furnish copies of the documents sought by the petitioner. In spite of the same, as the 5th respondent is not supplying the documents sought by the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed. 5 VS,J W.P.No.456 of 2018
3. When the writ petition came up for hearing on 30.01.2018, this Court passed an interim order directing the 5th respondent to comply with the order dated 26.05.2016, passed by the Chief Information Commissioner, A.P. Information Commission, Hyderabad, within a period of four weeks. 4. The 5th respondent has filed a counter affidavit enclosed with a vacate stay petition, wherein, it is stated that as per the interim orders granted by this Court on 30.01.2018, the 5th respondent has supplied the adangal copies of Fasli No.1369(1959), 1370(1960), 1371(1961) and 1385 (1975) of Marripalem village. In respect of Kapparada village, adangal for fasli No.1405 (1995) was supplied along with settlement record i.e., MDR (Manuscript Diglot Register) copy for the survey numbers which are available, vide Rc.No.422/2018/A, dated 22.02.2018, through registered post (RN897635567IN) on 24.02.2018. 5. Heard Sri. Gangisetti Uma Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 6. Perused the material available on record.
It can be seen that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 30.01.2018, the 5th respondent has furnished the available adangals to the petitioner as sought by him as per the provisions of the Right to Information Act. In view
6 VS,J W.P.No.456 of 2018
of the same, this Court is of the opinion that the cause in the writ petition would not survive for further adjudication. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 30.06.2026 Gss
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes Reportable No