MRS. HENRY D SOUZA v. AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK
WP/19156/2024 · 2026-09-29
T P Vivekananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43045 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43045 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010413662024 NC: 2026:KHC:54059 WP No. 19156 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 19156 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. HENRY D SOUZA, S/O AUGUSTINE D'SOUZA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT SY NO.301/1, NADA VILLAGE, BAINDOOR HOBLI, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576201
…PETITIONER (BY SRI.SAMEER I.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABDUL ANSAR P., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK CANARA BANK REGIONAL OFFICE, KAVI MANDANNA MARG, UDUPI-576101
2.
THE BRANCH MANAGER CANARA BANK, VADERAHOBLI BRANCH, KUNDAPURA TALUK,
Digitally signed by PAVITHRA B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010413662024 NC: 2026:KHC:54059 WP No. 19156 of 2024
UDUPI DISTRICT-576201
3.
MRS. RAZIYA BANU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, W/O. IKAS, R/O. 2/66, NEAR PRIMARY SCHOOL, MANIPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT-574105
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVCOATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT. 03/07/2024 OF HONBLE PRL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI, IN CRL. MIS. CASE 125/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING-B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that the loan account pertaining to the petitioner has been closed upon discharge of the entire loan amount. In the light of
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010413662024 NC: 2026:KHC:54059 WP No. 19156 of 2024
the said submission, the prayer that is sought in the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition.
3. Taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and taking the memo for withdrawal on record, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47