- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010484882017 NC: 2026:KHC:53215 RPFC No. 36 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 36 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. R. RAJAGOVINDA S/O RAMAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 38 NO.89/30, 3RD AMIN, KRISHNA LAYOUT, NYANAPPANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 076 AND ALSO AT SRI RAJA GOVINDA PROPRIETOR, SHAKTI INDUSTRIES, UNIT NO.II NO.148,5TH CROSS, OPP: CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTHOSH SHETTY, ADVOCATE AND SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. A. YASHODA W/O R.RAJAGOVINDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 2. MASTER R.PAVAN RAM S/O R.RAJAGOVINDA, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS (MINOR) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010484882017 NC: 2026:KHC:53215 RPFC No. 36 of 2023 REPT. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN/ MOTHER SMT.A.YASHODA PETITIONER NO.1 BOTH ARE R/AT NO.2, 13TH CROSS, HALAPPA LANE KILLARI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 053. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SIDDARAJU N., ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., VIDE HONBLE COURT ORDE DATED: 13.01.2023, THE WP NO.56718/2017 IS PERMITTED TO CONVERT THE PETITION IN TO RPFC., HENCE AS PER RPFC ENTIRE PETITION TO BE CORRECTED WHEREVER NECESSARY (ALL POINTS KEPT OPEN). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This RPFC is of the year 2023. Earlier, WP.No.56718/2017 was filed. By order dated 13.01.2023, permission was granted to convert the writ petition into RPFC, as the writ petition was not maintainable. Thereafter, to comply with the office objections, it is pending till 2026. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010484882017 NC: 2026:KHC:53215 RPFC No. 36 of 2023 2. When the matter came up before this court on 22.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption for ‘dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 3. Accordingly, RPFC is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61 *AK