- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010560462024 NC: 2026:KHC:53757 WP No. 26581 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 26581 OF 2024 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: SRI. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAPPA, R/O HUDUGURU VILLAGE, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D. NAGARAJA REDDY, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR - 563 101. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR - 563 101. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010560462024 NC: 2026:KHC:53757 WP No. 26581 of 2024 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR - 563 130. 6. SRI. S.G. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O GANGAPPA. 7. SRI. S.G. ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O GANGAPPA. RESPONDENTS NO.6 AND 7 ARE RESIDING AT SARJAPURA VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 125. 8. SMT. MANJULAMMA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O KRISHNAPPA, R/AT UKKUNDA VILLAGE, BUDDIKOTE HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK - 562 114. 9. SMT. SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O CHINAPPA, KANNURAHALLI VILLAGE, JADGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHANKAR REDDY FOR R6 AND R7; R8 AND R9 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010560462024 NC: 2026:KHC:53757 WP No. 26581 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20