2026:HHC:14238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1259 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30.04.2026. Chander Singh ...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Motta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge Learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 29.04.2026 along with the office order of the even date, in which, it has been stated that in compliance to the previous order dated 08.04.2026, the service of the petitioner has been taken over w.e.f. 04.05.1994 i.e. from the date of taking over of the College and the benefit has been granted to the petitioner vide order dated 29.04.2026. 2. Therefore, as judgment under reference stood complied with, no further orders are required to be passed in the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 present contempt petition. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate legal remedy available to him under the law, if he is still aggrieved. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the costs of Rs.5,000/- as imposed by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 has not been paid to the petitioner. 4. Learned Deputy Advocate General states that the costs shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of three days. For this limited purpose, list the case before the appropriate Bench on 05.05.2026. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 30th April, 2026 (Kiran)