- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010182762022 NC: 2026:KHC:51674 WP No. 8588 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8588 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHANKARE GOWDA S/O LATE KANNI GOWDANA DEVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING NEAR SITE NO.6 GUDIGERE GRAMA C A KERE HOBLI BHARATHI NAGARA POST-571422 MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571401 2. TAHASILDAR MADDUR TALUK MADDUR-571428 MANDYA DISTRICT. 3. SRI. C. MADHU @ V.MAHADEV S/O LATE CHANNE GOWDA URF MOTE GOWDA AGED : MAJOR Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010182762022 NC: 2026:KHC:51674 WP No. 8588 of 2022 RESIDING AT MELLAHALLI VILLAGE, C A KERE HOBLI, BHARATHI NAGARA POST-571422 MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. L. RAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA IN CASE NO. R.P.115/2015 DATED 17.3.2020 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-G AND THE ORDER OF THE TAHASILDAR MADDUR TALUK MADDUR IN CASE NO.RRCR 343/2021-22 DATED 10.3.2022 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-H BY THE ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR AN OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Sri. Shankaranarayana Bhat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Sri. Shamantha Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010182762022 NC: 2026:KHC:51674 WP No. 8588 of 2022 appearing for the respondent-State; and Sri. L. Raja, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 17.03.2023 passed by respondent No.1- Deputy Commissioner in case No.R.P.115/2015 (Annexure- G) and order dated 10.03.2022 passed by respondent No.2-Tahsildar in case No. RRCR.343/2021-22 (Annexure- H). 3. Taking into consideration that the impugned order at Annexure-G is an order of remand passed by respondent No.1-Deputy Commissioner, directing the respondent No.2-Tahsildar to take a fresh decision in the matter after examining the original records available on record, I am of the opinion that the respondent No.2-Tahasildar has taken decision and therefore, no interference is called for in this writ petition. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010182762022 NC: 2026:KHC:51674 WP No. 8588 of 2022 4. Sri. Shankaranarayana Bhat N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that interference with the subject land has been made by the respondent authorities after a period of sixty years. However, I am of the view that the petitioner is required to establish his right over the property in question before the competent civil Court and thereafter approach the revenue courts if need arises. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. All contentions of the parties are kept open. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14