Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43005 (CAL)

JHUMA NATHANY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23841/2026 · 2026-09-23

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15 Ranajit (AR.CT) 23.09.2026 Ct.05 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. NO 23841 OF 2026 Jhuma Nathany -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Mr. Vikas Baidya, Mr. Dipanjan Dutt, Mr. Soumya Nag, Mr. Sorojit Saha, Mr. Abhishek Agarwal …for the respondent no. 4. Mr. Rachit Lakhmani, Mr. Pijus Kanti Ghoshal ….for the State. 1. At the time of call no one appears on behalf of petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for. 2. However, State respondents and respondent no.4 are represented by learned advocates. 3. Writ petition stands dismissed for default. 4. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)