Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43001 (KAR)

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY v. LAKSHMIDEVI

WP/29126/2024 · 2026-09-28

Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010623662024 NC: 2026:KHC:53556 WP No. 29126 of 2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 29126 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY, NATIONAL HIGHWAY-48 (75), (HASSAN-BANTWALA SECTION), B.M.ROAD, OPP. HDCC BANK, HASSAN-573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASHA ANGADI.B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. LAKSHMIDEVI W.O H.D.SANJEEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT MANJUNATHA NAGAR, HASSAN. 2. HEMAVATHI W/O LATE B.R.ANNAJIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK. 3. THARA D/O LATE B.R.ANNAJIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT THOREMAVAINAKERE VILLAGE, BELLUR CROSS, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. 4. BHAGYALAKSHMI Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010623662024 NC: 2026:KHC:53556 WP No. 29126 of 2024 2 D/O LATE B.R.ANNAJIGOWDA, W/O CHANDRASHEKHARA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT HOSURU VILLAGE, KIRAGADLU POST, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK. 5. RUDREGOWDA S/O LATE B.R.ANNAJIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT S.L.V.SCHOOL, BYLAHALLI ROAD, MANACHANAHALLI POST, HASSAN TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE HON’BLE DISTRICT COURT TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FILED IN A 5/2017 BY THE PETITIONER AND TO DISPOSE OF THE SAME, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B. DIRECT THE HON’BLE DISTRICT COURT NOT TO RELEASE THE EXCESS AMOUNT SUM OF RS.7,42,492/- IN FAVOUR OF THE LEGAL HEIRS OF R-2. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER 1. A memo for withdrawal has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is stated that the excess amount deposited, which required to be refunded has already been received by the petitioner. Hence, the petition has become infructuous. HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010623662024 NC: 2026:KHC:53556 WP No. 29126 of 2024 3 3. The petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA