- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010662852026 NC: 2026:KHC:52896 WP No. 30235 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30235 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.M.PADMAVATHI W/O. M. ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.201, BRUNDAVANA APARTMENT KODIGEHALLI, KADUGODI, BENGALURU-560067. PERMANENT ADDRESS: NO.III-145-A-1-7, PRASHANTH NAGAR, MADANAPALLI TOWN, CHITTOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517325. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATACHALAPATHI K.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010662852026 NC: 2026:KHC:52896 WP No. 30235 of 2026 2. THE COMMISSSIONER OF SURVEY SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BENGAURU REGIONAL OFFICE BENGALURU DIVISION, BENGALURU-560001. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS/TECHNICAL ASSISTANT OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLARA DISTRICT-563101. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS KOLARA DISTRICT-563135. SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO IMPUGNED LETTER BEARING NO.RLDLR-TECHOMIS/240/2026- RJDLR-RJDLR BANGALORE DATED 05.08.2026 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-M, TO THE WRIT PETITION; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010662852026 NC: 2026:KHC:52896 WP No. 30235 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 05.08.2026 (Annexure-M) addressed by respondent No.3 to respondent No.4. 2. In that view of the matter, as the aforesaid letter addressed is an internal correspondence between the respondent - authorities, and in view of the law declared by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of MAHADEO AND OTHERS Vs. SOVAN DEVI AND OTHERS, reported in reported in (2023) 10 SCC 807, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. 4. However, it is open for the petitioner to agitate his rights in the event of infraction of his right, in a manner known to law. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38