Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42984 (CAL)

PARUL KUNDU v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25943/2026 · 2026-09-24

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24/09 2026 AD/28/18 266312 NANDY (CO-DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/25943/2026 PARUL KUNDU VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Bidhayak Lahiri, Advocate Mr. Bhaswati Lahiri, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Ms. Jayita Ray, Advocate Mr. Dipnarayan Chakraborty, Advocate ……for the State 1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. The petitioner was employed as a Female Health Worker (ANM). She joined sometime in 1983 and after getting the requisite benefits under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) was promoted as a Health Supervisor (Female) in September, 2006. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved that the persons, junior to her, have been promoted to the same post, after her, with a higher scale of pay. She accordingly seeks pay protection of her salary and entitlement at par with other persons who are similarly situated. In fact, she has produced an order dated February 24, 2023, copy whereof is kept on record, whereby another similarly situated person has been granted higher Pay Grade, at par with one Manisha Mukherjee. 4. The petitioner’s representations dated 18.09.2014, 06.06.2017, 31.12.2019 & 29.07.2021 for pay protection have not yet been considered. P a g e | 2 5. The concerned Officer, being respondent no. 2 herein, is directed to treat the writ petition as representation, copy whereof will be served on respondent no. 2 by October 31, 2026, and dispose it of in the light of the pay protection available to such Government employees and particularly in line with the Pay Grade of Manisha Mukherjee and Chitra Patra, who are similarly situated with the petitioner, by passing a reasoned order within a period of six weeks from the date of service of a copy of this order. 6. The resultant order will be communicated to the petitioner within a period of one week thereafter. 7. Since the petitioner has retired from service, if found eligible, she will be entitled to the notional benefits of pay protection which will be considered in addition to the arrears salary, if any. 8. With the afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 3