Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4298 (AP)

Garikapati Rama Brahmam v. Garikapati Dhana Lakshmi

FCA/279/2009 · 2026-07-05

Battu Devanand, Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for judgment : Date of Pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of Upload : 07.07.2026 APHC010058122009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 279 OF 2009 Between: 1. Garikapati Rama Brahmam, S/o. Venkatapati Rama Brahmam Pensioner R/o. Bapaiah Nagar, Amudalapalli Village, Nizamapatnam Manal, ...Petitioner AND 1. Garikapati Dhana Lakshmi, W/o. Rama Brahmam R/o. Banjara Naik Colony, Syamala Nagar Extn. Guntur Guntur District. 2. Garikapati Vijayalakshmi Naga Malleswari, D/o. Rama Brahmam R/o. Banjara Naik Colony, Syamala Nagar Extn. Guntur, Guntur District. ...Respondents Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 562 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in MOP.No. 294/2008 on the file of the Hon'ble Family court, Guntur District 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondents: M SUBBA REDDY The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 279 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Sri D. Anil Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri S. Satyanarayana Moorthy, learned counsel for the appellant on record, represents that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this appeal, this appeal has become infructuous. 2) The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3) Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 4) There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM Dated: 06.07.2026 PGR Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 279 OF 2009 Dt. 06.07.2026 PGR