Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42952 (KAR)

SRI.H.NAGARAJU v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/33857/2025 · 2026-09-25

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726032025 NC: 2026:KHC:53241 WP No. 33857 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 33857 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI.H.NAGARAJU S/O.LATE. HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO 183, KATTAPPA LANE, 7TH CROSS ROAD, KODIHALLI, BENGALURU-560008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA S.V..,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, EAST DIVISION, MAYOHALL, BENGALURU 560004. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726032025 NC: 2026:KHC:53241 WP No. 33857 of 2025 INDIARANAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU- 560008. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINNER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MAYOHALL BUILDING, BENGALURU-560004. 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, INDIARANAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU- 560008. 6. SMT.LAKSHMI, W/O GURUWAIAH, R/ AT NO.181/4 KATAPPA LANE, 7TH CROSS, KODIHALLI, YELLAMMA TEMPLE STREET, BENGALURU-560008. 7. SMT.PARVATHAMMA, D/O.LATE.KATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO 181, KODIHALLI VILLAGE, WARD NO 88, BENGALURU-560008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MONESH KUMAR K B.,ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO-DIRECT TO THE R1 TO 5 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 30.08.2025 REPRESENTATIONS PRODUCED AS ANNX-A TO D. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010726032025 NC: 2026:KHC:53241 WP No. 33857 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER Sri. Manjunatha S V, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition which reads as under: “That the petitioner above named most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit to withdraw the above said writ petition. The reason for the withdrawal is that of the relief been prayed in this Writ Petition is already granted in the W.P. No.7204/2021 of this Hon’ble Court. Hence the petitioner prays to this Hon’ble Court to permit to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice and equity.” The memo is accepted, and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-