Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42950 (KAR)

M.B.SIDDESHA v. SMT.BASAMMA

WP/28104/2026 · 2026-09-21

K V Aravind

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010613452026 NC: 2026:KHC:51987 WP No. 28104 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28104 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. M.B.SIDDESHA S/O MR. BASAVANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST R/AT MUTHUGADURU VILLAGE HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526 …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHIVAKUMARAPPA T. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.BASAMMA W/O SHEKHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST R/AT MUTHUGADURU VILLAGE HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526 2. PUSHPA W/O G VISHWANATH D/O LATE BASAPPA W/O LINGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS HOUSE WIFE R/O NO.924/23, 1ST CROSS, Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010613452026 NC: 2026:KHC:51987 WP No. 28104 of 2026 SHIVAKUMARSWAMY NAGARA DAVANAGERE-577005. 3. GURUSIDDAPPA S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 4. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 5. SANTHOSH S/O LATE GURUSIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESPONDENT No.3 TO 5 ARE R/AT MUTHUGADURU VILLAGE HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOLALKERE IN R.A. NO. 25 OF 2021 ON I.A NO.2 AND I.A. NO. 3 DATED 02.06.2026, VIDE ANNEXURE H TO THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010613452026 NC: 2026:KHC:51987 WP No. 28104 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Heard Sri.Shivakumarappa T.C., learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present writ petition impugns the order dated 02.06.2026, whereby the amendment sought by the plaintiff has been permitted. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amendment is without any basis. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. It is evident from the impugned order that the amendment sought was for correcting Survey No.19/4 as Survey No.99/4. The correction has been found necessary for adjudicating the dispute in the suit, having regard to the exhibits on record. The trial Court has further referred to the exhibits in paragraph No.6, wherein the property is referred to as Survey No.99/4, and all the revenue records pertaining to the said survey number also indicate the same. The amendment permitted is thus to bring the pleadings in - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010613452026 NC: 2026:KHC:51987 WP No. 28104 of 2026 conformity with the documentary evidence on record. No infirmity can be found in the impugned order. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33