Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4295 (BOM)

RAJKUMAR RAMPHER PANDEY AND ORS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

REVN/134/2026 · 2026-08-25

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

55-REVN-134-2026 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2026 Rajkumar Rampher Pandey and ors. ...Applicant/s Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondent/s ________________________________________________________________ Mr. K. H. Giri along with Mr. Pratik Yadav, Ms. Prachi Gupta and Mr. Dhavan Giri, Advocates for Applicants. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Sujay Gawade along with Mr. Santosh Thakur, Ms. Mudita Pawar and Ms. Mihika Save i/b. Shree and Company, Advocates for Respondent No.2. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned APP for respondent No.1 and learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to keep the contention of the applicant open to examine both the Investigating Officers, if required. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicants, the application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty and disposed of. 4. The applicants are permitted to examine both the Investigating Officers, if required. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.08.27 18:44:40 +0530