RAJESH URF BHOOT S/O SHRI DHARMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3486/2026 · 2026-03-25
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4291 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4291 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12626] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3486/2026 Rajesh Urf Bhoot S/o Shri Dharmsingh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Khandip, Police Station Bajirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Gangapur City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Happy Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 25/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.92/2024 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Gangapur City for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 365 and 364A of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is for inflicting grievous injury to Amit Kumar and for kidnapping. He submits that a compromise has been amicably arrived at between the parties. In support of his contentions, he has filed a copy of the compromise signed by the complainant/injured. Though ten
[2026:RJ-JP:12626] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3486/2026] criminal antecedents have been reported against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. Petitioner is behind the bars since 14.01.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4.
Learned counsel for the complainant has conceded to the
arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, admitted the factum of the compromise, and has raised no objection to the grant of bail to the present petitioner.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Rajesh Urf Bhoot S/o Shri Dharmsingh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/98