SUDHA MISHRA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/8107/2026 · 2026-03-18
Atul Sreedharan, Siddharth Nandan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8107 of 2026 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to seek alternative remedy available in law.
2. Shri Abhishek Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. March 19, 2026 Sumit K. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Brij Napit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.) Sudha Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad