Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42885 (CAL)

N.M. ABU MOHAMMED v. MOHAMMED KHATEEB KAMRAN

FMAT/359/2026 · 2026-09-24

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, Sandip Kumar De

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L. 2. September 24, 2026. MNS. FMAT No. 359 of 2026 + CAN 1 of 2026 + CAN 2 of 2026 N. M. Abu Mohammed Vs. Mohammed Khateeb Kamran Mr. Tarique Quasimuddin, Mr. Nasir Quasimuddin, Ms. Sanchita Chaudhuri, Advs. … for the appellant. 1. It appears from the records that the present miscellaneous appeal is not maintainable before this Court. 2. Accordingly, FMAT No. 359 of 2026 is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to the appellant to file a properly constituted challenge against the impugned order before the appropriate forum. 3. Consequentially, CAN 1 of 2026 and CAN 2 of 2026 are disposed of as well. 4. There will be no order as to costs. 5. Leave is granted to the learned Advocate-on-record for the appellant to take back the certified copy of the impugned order upon furnishing a photocopy thereof for the records. (Sandip Kumar De, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)