1 2026:CGHC:16240-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1608 of 2026 Ankit Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Through President Uma Kesharwani, Office At Rapta Chowk Sanichari Bazar Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare And Medical Education, Sawasthya Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Director Health Services, Sawasthya Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Commissioner Bilaspur Region/chairman, Jeevandeep Committee, State Mental Hospital, Sendri, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Hospital Superintendent State Mental Hospital, Sendri, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - R.M.O./food Incharge Officer State Mental Hospital, Sendri, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Patel, Advocate For State/ Respondents : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Government Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 09 .0 4 .202 6 1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief(s):- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 02.04.2026 vide क्रमांक / भोजन / निननिदा/2026/790 issued by respondent no. 4. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner's rights under the agreement dated 30.04.2025 and permit the petitioner to continue providing food services to the hospital inpatients in accordance with the work order dated 28.04.2025 vide क्र./ भोजन/2025/955 issue by the respondent no. 4. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court, may deem fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case. 10.4 Cost of the petition.” 2 Heard Mr. Arvind Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents on I.A. No. 02 of 2026, which is an application for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to institute a fresh comprehensive petition incorporating certain material documents and grounds in the interest of justice. 3 On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application the same is allowed. 4 Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra