Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010433802026 NC: 2026:KHC:52652 WP No. 19749 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 19749 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. S.M. SUDARSHAN REDDY, S/O S.M.MUNIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
2. G.PAVITHRA, W/O. S.M SUDARSHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF NO. E 529, ATAL BIHARI VAJPAI CIRCLE, NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL, THIRUPALYA, BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BANGALORE - 560 099. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANABASAPPA S N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 562 110.
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010433802026 NC: 2026:KHC:52652 WP No. 19749 of 2026
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL - 562 106.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL - 562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE PRESENTATION DATED:20.01.2026 CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO 2 TO 4 TO PASS NECESSARY ORDERS RESERVING THE PUBLIC ROAD IN THE SY NO 9 AS PER ANNEXED SKETCH AT ANNEXURE-A AND ANNEXURE - 'E' AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, ISSUE SUCH OTHER DIRECTIONS, AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE FACT S AND CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.AN
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010433802026 NC: 2026:KHC:52652 WP No. 19749 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners sought for direction to respondent No.4 to consider the representation dated 20.01.2026 (Annexure-A) seeking, road to access to the property in question.
2. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.4 is
directed to consider the representation produced at Annexure-A, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23