Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42852 (PAT)

YASHWANT SINGH @ SANTOSH SINGH v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./88810/2024 · 2026-01-09

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88810 of 2024 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42716 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2024 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== YASHWANT SINGH @ SANTOSH SINGH S/O KRISHNA SINGH R/O SANT NAGAR, BHABUA, WARD NO.- 3, P.O AND PS - BHABUA, Dist- BHABUA AT KAIMUR ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RUCHI DEVI @ LAKSHMI DEVI W/O YASHWANT SIGH @ SANTOSH SINGH, D/O SACHIDANAND R/O VILLAGE- MOKRI, P.S- BHABHUA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR AT BHABHUA AT PRESENT R/O WARD NO.6, BHABHUA INFRONT OF PATEL COLLEGE,P.S- BHABHUA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR AT BHABHUA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Kumar Seth, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 09-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed for modification of order dated 13.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42716 of 2024 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court whereby the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail with a condition to pay Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) per month, as interim solace/maintenance, in the bank account of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88810 of 2024(3) dt.09-01-2026 2/3 informant/Opposite Party No. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of aforesaid order, petitioner is regularly paying aforesaid amount in the bank account of Opposite Party No. 2 but the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 does not wants to live with this petitioner and has also suppressed the fact that she is a divorced lady and, therefore, the order dated 13.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42716 of 2024 requires modification, so far as payment of Rs. 5,000/-, as maintenance, is concerned. 4. This Court, while allowing pre-arrest bail to the petitioner vide order dated 13.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42716 of 2024, on the submission of petitioner himself, had directed him to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim relief/solace to Opposite Party No.2 with observation that the aforesaid payment will be subject to any order passed in the maintenance case for final settlement. The issue of maintenance or the fact that the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 is a divorced lady and has suppressed this information cannot be decided by this Court. It can only be decided by the concerned Court at the stage of trial after giving full opportunity to both the parties and as such, the modification petition cannot be allowed on this ground alone. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88810 of 2024(3) dt.09-01-2026 3/3 5. Accordingly, this modification petition is dismissed. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T