GOMED KUMAR PATHAK v. PT. SUNDARLAL SHARMA (OPEN) UNIVERSITY,
WPS/2310/2024 · 2026-04-01
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4285 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4285 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2
2026:CGHC:15307
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2310 of 2024 Gomed Kumar Pathak S/o Ramesh Pathak Aged About 34 Years R/o A-13, P S City Colony, Ring Road No. 01, New Changorabhata, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492001
... Petitioner versus 1 - Pt. Sundarlal Sharma (Open) University, Through Its Registrar, Koni Birkona Road, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Vice- Chancellor Pt. Sundarlal Sharma (Open) University, Koni Birkona Road, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, First Floor, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sandeep Kumar Dewangan S/o Tejram Dewangan Through The Office Of Chief Technical Examiner (Vigilance) 3rd Block, 1st Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, 492002, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Advocate For Respondent no. 1 : Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG
2 / 2 For Respondent no. 4 : Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate For State : Mrs. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 02.04.2026
1. Heard on IA No. 08, which is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that according to his instructions the respondents are considering the claim of petitioner, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage.
3.
Learned counsel for the respective respondents do no oppose the submission made by learned counsel for petitioner.
4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. However, reserving liberty with the petitioner to repeat the prayer, if any exigency arises in future. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza