43 23.09.2026 Ct. No.17 J.Das FAT 2699 of 1991 Sk. Sorab Ali Vs. Md. Din 1. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. 2. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. 3. It appears from the report filed by the Department that the defects pointed out by the Department as far back as in 1992 have not been cured. 4. In view of the above, FAT 2699 of 1991 stands dismissed for default. 5. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. [Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.] [Atarup Banerjee, J.]