Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42844 (CAL)

INTAKHAB ALAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1844/2026 · 2026-09-23

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.69. Rakib CRM (M) 1844 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Intakhab Alam ……Petitioner. Mr. Rahul Ganguly .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Amata Ghose Mr. Probal Das ……for the State. Mr. Shabbir Ahmed Mr. Pawan Gupta Mr. Arnab Saha Mr. Abhimanyu Banerjee Ms. Sofia Nesar Mr. Santanu Sett Mr. Abdul Nooman .......for the De-facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to proceed with the bail application. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1844 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)