Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4283 (AP)

POTHAKAMURI SRINIVAS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/94/2023 · 2026-06-30

Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : . . . . . . . . . Date of pronouncement : 01.07.2026 Date of uploading : 07.07.2026 APHC010005322023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 94/2023 Between: 1. POTHAKAMURI SRINIVAS, , S/O. CHAYA SHANKARBABU, AGED 31 YEARS, OCC.EMPLOY, R/O. D.NO.61-8/1-2, POLICE COLONY, KOTINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT. 2. POTHAKAMURI CHAYA SHANKARBABU, , S/O. NAGAYYA, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE TEACHER, R/O H. NO. 5-126, PANCHYAT BORE STREET, OPP HANUMAN JUNCTION P,S BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. POTHAKAMURI INDIRA,, W/O. CHAYA SHANKARBABU, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O H. NO. 5-126, PANCHYAT BORE STREET, OPP HANUMAN JUNCTION P.S BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. MUNTHA RUPADEVI,, W/O. SIVA NAGA CHAITANYA, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O. FLAT NO.308, SILICONVALLEY, APPARTMENT NALLURAHALLI, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 2 2. POTHAKAMURI RUPASRI, W/O SRINIVAS, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.61-8/1-2, POLICE COLONY, KOTINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the entire proceedings in Crime No. 850 of 2022 in Krishnalanka Police Station, NTR District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of certified copy of FIR in FIR dt. 12.12.2022 in Crime No. 850 of 2022 of Krishnalanka Police Station, NTR District and receive the main Criminal Petition on file in the interests of justice and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in Crime No. 850 of 2022 in Krishnalanka Police Station, NTR District, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. UYYURI MANIVARUN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. UYYURI MANIVARUN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. TORATI SHANMUKHA PRASANNA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 04.01.2023, when the matter was listed, this Court, having been satisfied with the contentions raised in the petition, dispensed with the presence of petitioners 2 to 4 in Crime No.850 of 2022 on the file of Krishnalanka Police Station, NTR District. Since then, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Taking note of the said non-appearance, this Court, on 07.01.2026, directed the matter to be listed on 08.01.2026 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Thereafter, when the matter was listed on 18.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Y.R.Sai Adarsh, learned counsel, would submit that Mr.U.Manivarun, learned counsel for the petitioners, is no more, and that in the interregnum period, charge sheet is filed and liberty may be given to challenge the charge sheet before the appropriate forum. 4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State/respondent No.1, also submits that the charge sheet is filed and the trial has commenced. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Criminal Petition is closed as no further orders are necessary. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 01-07-2026 BMS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑