23.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.894. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 2428 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Basirhat Cyber Crime Police Station case no. 05 of 2026 dated 19.07.2026 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/319(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhits, 2023. And In the matter of : Pallavi Roy ……Petitioner. Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Ms. Priyanka Bhattacharyya Ms. Sagnika Banerjee .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Arup Kr. Bhowmick ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been arrested on 7th of August, 2026 and since then she is in custody. Another accused person was the principal accused and the petitioner has been implicated as she was a part of the chain involved in the alleged offence. Petitioner has innocently done her work without knowing the degree of culpability. Petitioner, is a lady and is in custody for more than 45 days. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there are antecedents of the petitioner as also the fact that petitioner’s complicity in the present case has surfaced and a cheque has been seized amounting to Rs.5,00,000/-. I have taken into account sections under which the investigation is in progress and the prescribed punishment therein is for less than 7 years. The statutory period for submission of the report 2 in final form is for 60 days and the petitioner is in custody for almost 45 days. Having regard to the period of detention undergone and the nature of the offence which is being investigated, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail as petitioner is a lady. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Pallavi Roy shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned trial Court in seisin of the case and shall make herself available as and when required by the investigating officer for the sake of investigation. Additionally, petitioner shall furnish her address where she would be residing are would be ready to available for cooperating with the investigation. Thus, CRM (M) No. 2428 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)