[2026:RJ-JP:16175] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1218/2026 Asha Ram S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Galod, Police Station Peeplu, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav Ms. Anisha Yadav Mr. Ashish Bagadi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/04/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.142/2025 registered at Police Station-Peeplu, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that, in compliance with the earlier order dated 23.02.2026, the petitioner has duly marked his presence before the concerned Investigating Officer, and the said Investigating Officer has investigated the matter. He submits that he has CCTV footage of his own house, according to which, at the time of the alleged [2026:RJ-JP:16175] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1218/2026] incident he was not present on the place of occurrence. He further submits that the allegations made by the complainant are false, baseless, and on concocted grounds. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and has submitted the factual report of the present case. As per the factual report submitted by the concerned SHO dated 16.03.2026, it has been found during the course of investigation that the petitioner was not present at the time of the alleged incident. 5. Considering the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the factual matrix of the case but without commenting on the merits/demerits thereof, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Asha Ram S/o Laxminarayan, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the [2026:RJ-JP:16175] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1218/2026] facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/39