IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21029 of 2025 ====================================================== Ram Ekabal Paswan, S/o Kumar Vimal, R/o Village - Turki, Post- Muradabad, P.S. Agarer, District- Rohtas, Bihar-821113. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 5. The Anchal Adhikari, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (04) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 12-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “i) For a Direction to the Respondent State as to demarcation of my Land in question Khata No. 35, Khesra No. 312 an area 56 decimal & Khesra No. 316 an area 79 Decimal, and Khata No. 36, Khesra No. 313 an area 85 decimal & Khesra No. 315 an area lacre 14 decimal of Mauza- Turki, Village -Turki, Anchal- Sasaram within the District of Rohtas. ii) For a further direction to the Patna High Court CWJC No.21029 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 Respondent to Demarcation of the aforesaid piece of land in the favors of this Petitioner as he is fulfilling all the criteria's made in this regard as while at one hand. iii) For any other relief or reliefs, the Petitioner is entitled for.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite repeated representation before the Circle Officer, Sasaram (respondent no. 5), he is not taking the matter to its logical conclusion. 4. Learned State counsel submits that if a proper petition is preferred, the same shall be taken to its logical conclusion. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer, Sasaram (respondent no. 5) along with the proper petition. The Circle Officer, Sasaram (respondent no. 5), after hearing the parties, shall pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and it is expected that the matter shall be taken to its logical conclusion by 30.06.2026. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U