- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010134792026 NC: 2026:KHC:53185 RP No.86 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.86 OF 2026 IN *REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.214 OF 2014 BETWEEN: V. RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE C. VADAVARTHI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.38/1, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, SHIVANAGAR, BIRANGIPALYA, BENGALURU – 560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RODDA VEERASHETTY BHIMARAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SHIVANANJAMMA W/O SRI. G.S. BASAVARAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT NO.1029, 1ST FLOOR, 5TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARNAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 079. 2. SMT. B.N. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA W/O G. GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.650, 3RD STAGE, * Corrected vide Chambers Order dated 30.09.2026. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010134792026 NC: 2026:KHC:53185 RP No.86 of 2026 2ND BLOCK, BASAVESHWARNAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 079. 3. SMT. B.H. GANGAMMA D/O B. HANUMAPPA. AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS. R/AT NO.1074, 3RD STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, 6TH MAIN, BASAVESHWARNAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YASHWANTH NETHAJI N.T., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V. NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURED, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 21ST NOVEMBER, 2025 PASSED IN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.214 AND 2014 AND RECALL THE SAME IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is seeking to review the judgment and decree dated 21st November, 2025 passed by this Court in Regular First Appeal No.214 of 2025. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010134792026 NC: 2026:KHC:53185 RP No.86 of 2026 2. Heard Sri. Rodda Veerashetty Bhimarao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Yashwanth Nethaji N.T., learned counsel on behalf of Sri. K.V. Narasimhan, appearing for the respondent No.1. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, taking into consideration the finding recorded by this Court at paragraphs 22 to 25 of the judgment and decree dated 21st November, 2025 passed in Regular First Appeal No.214 of 2025 and the provision contained under Section 30(2) of the Registration Act, 1908, I am of the view that, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. Accordingly, Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8