Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42780 (PAT)

Suganti Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./86014/2025 · 2026-01-07

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86014 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2025 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan ====================================================== 1. Suganti Devi W/O Ranjit Ram R/O Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, Street No.- 4, P.S.- Siwan Town, Dist.- Siwan 2. Ranjit Ram S/O Chandeshwar Ram R/O Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, Street No.- 4, P.S.- Siwan Town, Dist.- Siwan 3. Manish Ram S/O Ranjit Ram R/O Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, Street No.- 4, P.S.- Siwan Town, Dist.- Siwan 4. Sugi Devi @ Suggi Devi W/O Manish Ram R/O Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, Street No.- 4, P.S.- Siwan Town, Dist.- Siwan 5. Suraj Kumar S/O Ranjit Ram R/O Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, Street No.- 4, P.S.- Siwan Town, Dist.- Siwan 6. Golu Kumar S/O Ranjit Ram R/O Mohalla- Rajendra Nagar, Street No.- 4, P.S.- Siwan Town, Dist.- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115, 74, 118(1), 303(2), 351(1), 352, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per the prosecution case, these petitioners and one co-accused are alleged to have assaulted informant and others, as a result of which, three persons sustained injuries. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86014 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of land dispute between the parties, scuffle took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Petitioners are own Gotiyas of informant. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 557 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T