Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4278 (JHR)

ABUL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2394/2026 · 2026-03-25

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8443 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2394 of 2026 Abul Ansari, aged about 46 years, Son of Chiraj Ansari, Resident of House No. 126, Santhal Tola, Chas, Radhanagar, P.O. and P.S.- Radhanagar, District- Bokaro. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, APP For the Informant : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate --- 05/25.03.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025, registered under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 117(2), 125(a), 74, 109, 303(2) and 351(2) read with section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that the case was registered by the petitioner prior to the present case. He submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.09.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties, on the other hand, have opposed the prayer for bail and have submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner in the First Information Report itself and the victim has suffered grievous injury and there are criminal antecedents against the petitioner as recorded in the 2026:JHHC:8443 2 impugned order itself which are of serious nature. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct and specific allegation against the petitioner which is of serious nature and also the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and hence, this bail application is rejected. 6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:25.03.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:28.03.2026