Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4275 (RAJ)

ZAKIR S/O RAMJAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

/17151/2025 · 2026-04-15

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15575] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17151/2025 Zakir S/o Ramjan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Aakeda, Police Sta- tion Aakeda, District Nuh Mewat, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sriram Dhakad, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 324/2024 registered at Police Station Tapukda, District Bhiwadi for offence under Sections 121(1), 132, 109(1) of BNS 2023 and under Sections 5, 8, 9 Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter And Regu- lation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act and under Sections 16, 54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act and under Sections 3, 25, 5, 27 of the Arms Act. 2. Heard. [2026:RJ-JP:15575] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17151/2025] 3. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the charge-sheet. 4. As per the conclusion of the charge-sheet, the allega- tion against the accused-petitioner for contravention of the provi- sions of Section 54A of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (for short ‘the Act of 1950’) has been found to be true, but the Police has not submitted any charge-sheet against him for any offence other than Section 54A of the Act of 1950. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2025 and there are no other criminal antecedence discredit to the accused-petitioner. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor is not in a position to controvert the fact that the Police has concluded that the allegation against the accused-petitioner are true to the extent of the offence punishable under Section 54A of the Act of 1950. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the conclusion of the investigation qua the present petitioner and more particularly the fact that he is in custody since 08.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of [2026:RJ-JP:15575] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17151/2025] the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /26