Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4273 (ORI)

SUBHAM ROUT v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/2301/2026 · 2026-04-24

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 2301 of 2026 Subham Rout …. Petitioner Mr. I.A. Acharya, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Ray, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 24.04.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is an accused in connection with C.T. Case No.46 of 2025, pending on the file of learned A.D.J-cum-Special Court, Bargarh, arising out of Sohela P.S. Case No.319 of 2025, for commission of alleged offences under Sections 65(1) /296 /351(3)/ 3(5) BNS, 2023 read with Section 4 of POCSO Act. 3. Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. case is pending in any other Court. 4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.483 of BNSS by the learned A.D.J.-cum-Special Court under POCSO Act, p. 2 Bargarh by order dated 11.12.2025 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed. 5. The prosecution case in brief is that the complainant lodged a report on 17.10.2025 stating that the accused has love relationship with her and on 10.10.2025, the accused came to her house and kept physical relations with her. When the complainant and her mother went to the house of the accused, the accused & his father abused and threatened them in the public meeting held for settlement in the issue. 6. Taking into account that charge sheet has been filed on 16.12.2025 and since the consideration by the learned Court in seisin over the matter was during the course of investigation, this Court is not inclined to consider this bail application at this stage without having the benefit of consideration of materials qua the accusation relating to the petitioner by the learned Court in seisin post charge sheet. 7. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to renew their prayer before for the learned Court in seisin after submission of final form, which shall be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the earlier rejection or the order passed by this Court. p. 3 8. Accordingly, the BLAPL stand disposed of. U.C.C as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Designation: Jr. Stenographer