VISHAL MURLIDHAR PATIL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
BA/18/2026 · 2026-08-18
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4272 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4272 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
P.H. Jayani
501 BA18.2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2026 Vishal Murlidhar Patil
…. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr. …. Respondents Mr. Onkar Gurav i/b. Mr. Anjali Patil for the Applicant. Ms. Anagha Deshmukh, APP for Respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Sumaiya Khan, appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. Ms. Anupama Patil, PSI, Dadar Police Station, present.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED : 18th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :-
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board.
2. Mr. Gurav, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Bail Application and requested to direct the trial Court to expedite the hearing and dispose of the case within one year. Further, he seeks liberty to file a fresh bail Application, if the trial is not concluded within the said period.
3. Leave to withdraw is granted, with aforesaid liberty.
4. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
5. It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits.
6. The trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the case and endeavour to dispose of the same within one year.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
1/1 PREETI HEERO JAYANI Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date: 2026.08.19 19:53:09 +0530