Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 9920 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9920 of 2026
1. Irfan Ahmed Tyagi S/o.Furkan Ahmad Tyagi, Residing at Housr No.996, R Sujru-7, Muzaffar Nagar, State of Utter Pradesh. 2. Shaista Begum W/o.Irfan Ahmed Tyagi, Residing at Housr No.996, R Sujru-7, Muzaffar Nagar, State of Utter Pradesh. 3. Mohd Mukeem S/o.Mohd Haneef, Mohalla - NAI Basti, Ward No.12, Jaspur Khurd, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Shoolagiri Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Cr.No.507/2025. ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying to set aside the order passed by the learned District Judge (Sessions) Krishnagiri,
Krishnagiri
District
in
Crl.MP.No.418/2026
in Crl.MP.NO.143/2026 dated 04.02.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 9920 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): M/S. E.Kannadasan For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) ******* ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the order passed by the learned District Judge (Sessions) Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District in Crl.MP.No.418/2026 in Crl.MP.NO.143/2026 dated 04.02.2026. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioners are alleged to have abused the de facto complainant with filthy language, assaulted him and threatened with dire consequences. Hence, a case has been registered. Subsequently, the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krishagiri in Crl.M.P.No.143 of 2026 dated 09.07.2026 with certain conditions. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this is a case and case in counter. To avoid subsequent entanglement with the complainant, the petitioners wanted to modify the bail condition and filed a modification petition in Crl.MP.No.418 of 226 seeking to sign before the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate, whereas, the learned Principal Sessions judge, Krishnagiri has dismissed the petition. He would further submit that the condition imposed against the counter party was now relaxed and hence, the petitioners are now https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 9920 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 willing to sign before the concerned Court. 4. In view of the above submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m for a period of two weeks. 29-06-2026 KMI To 1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri. 2.The Inspector of Police, Shoolagiri Police Station, Krishnagiri District.
3.The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 9920 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. KMI CRL OP No. 9920 of 2026 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis