Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 42707 (PAT)

Ram Lakhan Mehta v. Tuleshwar Mahto

MJC/4368/2024 · 2026-02-13

Arun Kumar Jha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4368 of 2024 In CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1707 of 2018 ====================================================== 1. Ram Lakhan Mehta Son of Late Sakilchand Mehta, Resident of Village- Birhara, P.O. Purhara, P.S. - Haspura, District- Aurangabad. 2. Deo Lakhan Mehta, Son of Late Sakilchand Mehta, Resident of village- Birhara, P.O. Purhara, P.S. Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 3. Chandresh Mehta, Son of Late Sakilchand Mehta, Resident of village- Birhara, P.O. - Purhara, P.S.- Haspura, District- Aurangabad. 4. Manresh Mehta, Son of Late Sakilchand Mehta, Resident of village- Birhara, P.O. - Purhara, P.S. Haspura, District- Aurangabad. 5. Kamlesh Mehta, Son of Late Sakilchand Mehta, Resident of village - Birhara, P.O. Purhara, P.S. Haspura, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Tuleshwar Mahto Son of Late Ramkeshar Mahto, Resident of village- Birhara, P.O. - Purhara, P.S.- Haspura, District- Aurangabad. 2. Arjun Singh, Son of Late Karu Mehta, Resident of Village- Birhara, P.O. - Purhara, P.S. Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 3. Nandlal Singh, Son of Late Karu Mehta, Resident of Village- Birhara, P.O. - Purhara, P.S. Haspura, District - Aurangabad. 4. Arun Singh, Son of Late Karu Mehta, Resident of Village- Birhara, P.O. - Purhara, P.S. Haspura, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sharad Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 4 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of Civil Misc. Case No.1707 of 2018, which stood dismissed for non- prosecution on 30.09.2024. 3. On being satisfied with the reasons mentioned in this petition explaining omission on part of the petitioners, the Patna High Court MJC No.4368 of 2024(4) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 same is allowed and Civil Misc. Case No.1707 of 2018 is restored to its original file. V.K.Pandey/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T