- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010603972026 NC: 2026:KHC:51484 WP No. 27389 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 27389 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VENKATESH. K. S. S/O. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS WORKING AS PRINCIPAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (BACKWARD CLASS-734 BUKKAPATNA, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 137. (PRESENTLY UNDER SUSPENSION) … PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH N D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, (AN ORGANISATION OF GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA), REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NO.8, M.S. BUILDING, 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR, Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010603972026 NC: 2026:KHC:51484 WP No. 27389 of 2026 CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052. 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, NO.8, M.S. BUILDING, 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052. (THE AUTHORITY WHO HAS PASSED THE IMPUGNED ORDER) 4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR - 572 101. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI RAO, HCGP FOR R1; SRI C. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER BEARING NO.KREIS/ENQR/DISP/62/2026-ADMN/E-347839 DATED 10.08.2026 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 (ANNEXURE-A), INSOFAR AS IT PLACES THE PETITIONER UNDER SUSPENSION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010603972026 NC: 2026:KHC:51484 WP No. 27389 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking for issuance of writ of certiorari to set aside the order at Annexure-A passed by the respondent no.3 insofar as it places the petitioner under suspension. 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for respondent no.2 has produced the order dated 04.09.2026 passed by the respondent no.2 giving the order of posting to the petitioner. 3. In light of issuance of order dated 04.09.2026 amounting to deemed revocation of the suspension proceedings, the petition is disposed of as not calling for any adjudication. All other contentions are kept open. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP