Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4270 (CHH)

M/S WALL LIFE INDIA v. UNION OF INDIA

WPT/121/2021 · 2026-04-05

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15465 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 121 of 2021 1. M/s Wall Life India Through Shri Raj Bedi, Proprietor, Aged About 28, Residing At Lig - 1, 333/34, Sector -2, Pandit Deendayal Upadhayay Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492010. 2. Shri Raj Bedi, Proprietor S/o Shri Om Prakash Bedi Aged About 28 Years Residing At Lig -1, 333/34, Sector 2, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492010. 3. Shri Paramanand Ramwani S/o Shri Subahash Ramwani Aged About 44 Years Residing At House No. 528, Infront Of Dr. Lalwani Clinic, Lakhe Nagar, Raipur, 492001. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue New Delhi India 110001. 2. The Director General Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Sixth Floor, B Wing, Janpath Bhawan, Janpath, New Delhi. 3. Directorate General Of Revenue Intelligence Through Additional Director, Indore Zonal Unit, First Floor, Bsnl Telephone Exchange Building, Transport Nagar, Indore (M.P.) 452014. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For U.O.I. : Mr. Abhishek Banjare, C.G.C. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06.04 .2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would fairly submit that against the order impugned an appeal has been preferred according to the provisions of Section 129A of Customs Act, 1962. He would submit that the petitioners SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.04.06 14:06:26 +0530 2 may be permitted to pursue the pending appeal. 2. Heard. 3. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to pursue pending appeal. The authority concerned is directed to expedite the pending appeal. 4. With the aforesaid observation(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant