Praveen Kumar v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/16129/2026 · 2026-06-25
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42657 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 42657 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 16129 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 16129 of 2026 Praveen Kumar ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police Kangeyam-All Women Police Station, Tiruppur. Crime No.8 of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.8 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kangeyam - All Women Police Station, Tiruppur. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Thinesh For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side)
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 5(1) r/w 6, 11(5) r/w 12, 16 r/w 17, 18 of POCSO Act, 2012 in Crime No.8 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16129 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with the co- accused, sexually assaulted the prosecutrix. Hence, the present case was registered.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the matter is still under investigation.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side.
6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the allegations and the fact that the matter is still under investigation, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16129 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 25-06-2026 NSL To
1. The learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram, (FTMC), Tiruppur.
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore.
3. The Inspector of Police, Kangeyam-All Women Police Station, Tiruppur.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 16129 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NSL CRL OP No. 16129 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis