Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4265 (GAU)

ALAUDDIN AHMED v. BANK OF BARODA AND 3 ORS

MC/11/2026 · 2026-03-10

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010042952026 2026:GAU-AS:3568- DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MC/11/2026 ALAUDDIN AHMED S/O- LATE MAMTAJ ALI, RESIDENT OF NAYANPUR, HOUSE NO. 6, BYE LANE NO. 2, P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR, DIST. KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN- 781005. VERSUS BANK OF BARODA AND 3 ORS REHABARI BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF MANAGER, HOUSE NO. 28, FIRST FLOOR, A.M. ROAD, SUHAGPUR, KAMRUP METRO, GUWAHATI-781007. 2:CHIEF MANAGER BANK OF BARODA REHABARI BRANCH HOUSE NO. 28 FIRST FLOOR A. M. ROAD SUHAGPUR GUWAHATI- 781007. 3:REGIONAL MANAGER BANK OF BARODA BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781003 ASSAM 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-781005 Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HUSSAIN, MR A H TOUFIQ Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/278/2026 ALAUDDIN AHMED S/O- LATE MAMTAJ ALI RESIDENT OF NAYANPUR HOUSE NO. 6 BYE LANE NO. 2 P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781005. VERSUS BANK OF BARODA AND 3 ORS REHABARI BRANCH REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF MANAGER HOUSE NO. 28 FIRST FLOOR A.M. ROAD SUHAGPUR KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI-781007. 2:CHIEF MANAGER BANK OF BARODA REHABARI BRANCH HOUSE NO. 28 FIRST FLOOR A. M. ROAD SUHAGPUR GUWAHATI- 781007. 3:REGIONAL MANAGER BANK OF BARODA BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781003 Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-781005. ------------ Advocate for : MD. B HUSSAIN Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for BANK OF BARODA AND 3 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 11-03-2026 (AD Choudhury, J) 1. This application is filed praying for recalling the order dated 28.01.2026, passed in WP(C) 278/2026, with a further prayer to restore the same to its original file, whereby the connected writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Heard Mr. Toufiq, the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Perused the averments made in the application. 4. Having gone through the averments made in the petition, we are satisfied that good grounds have been assigned by the petitioner for restoring the connected writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the order dated 28.01.2026 is recalled and the connected writ petition is restored to its original number. 6. Registry to list the connected writ petition on 04.05.2026. Page No.# 4/4 7. The Misc Case stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant