Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4263 (ORI)

AJIT SAHU v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/2288/2026 · 2026-04-24

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 2288 of 2026 Ajit Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. S. N. Mishra 4, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 24.04.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is an accused in connection with C.T. Case No.20 of 2026, pending on the file of JMFC, Kesinga arising out of Kesinga P.S. Case No.21 of 2026, for commission of alleged offences under Sections 205/ 310(4)/ 310(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 read with Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959. 3. Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. case is pending in any other Court. 4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.483 of BNSS by the learned Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge, Kalahandi at Bhawanipatna by order dated 24.02.2026 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed. 5. The prosecution case in brief is that on the alleged date of 26.01.2026 at about 5.30 A. M., on receiving credible information about the preparation of dacoity against the night plying vehicles/road users by 5 to 6 persons at Palam toll gate by using one Mahindra Scorpio vehicle along with the amber beacon Police light, armed with deadly weapons, the informant along with his co- staffs left the place to verify the authenticity of the information. On their arrival at the spot, two persons managed to flee from the spot but he could manage to nab other four. On being asked they disclosed their names as well as of the escaped person. 6. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner is in custody since 26.01.2026 and as charge sheet has already been filed, he may be released on bail. 7. Learned counsel for the State opposes such prayer. 8. Considering the nature of allegations and filing of the charge sheet and the Petitioner has no criminal proclivity, this Court directs the Petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin subject to verification of criminal antecedent. 9. If it comes to fore that the Petitioner has any criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to. 10. Additionally, it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional police station once every month on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin for the next three months. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the Court in seisin. 11. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Designation: Jr. Stenographer