IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83620 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-366 Year-2024 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dhanu Yadav @ Narendra Yadav S/O Ramashray Chaudhary R/O Vill.- Kukurbhuka, P.S.- Kateya, Dist.- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepankar Raj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 06-01-2026 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 366 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S.-2023. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing assault to the informant and his brother along with co-accused Rajesh Yadav by means of lathi and danda, leading to serious injuries on their hands and leg. Besides the aforesaid allegation, there is further allegation against other accused persons of causing assault to the informant and other family members and of snatching valuables . 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner taking this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83620 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/3 Court through the FIR submitted that specific accusation has been levelled against the petitioner of causing assault by means of lathi along with other accused persons over hand and leg, which is admittedly not the vital part. Moreover, during the course of investigation, it has found that the injury, which is allegedly sustained to the brother of the informant is simple in nature. The injuries, which have been sustained on the vital part of the body of the informant, that has not been attributed to the petitioner. It is further contended that though the petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as has been disclosed in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application, however, he undertakes that he will fully co-operate in the proceeding of the Court and would not indulge in such activities in future. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application. 6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of accusation against the petitioner, coupled with the undertaking of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83620 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 3/3 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- VI, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 366 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further conditions that:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (ii) In case, if the petitioner shall be found indulge in intimidating the informant/witnesses or tampering with the evidence, the State/informant shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail. shivank/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T