MAHAVEER GURJAR S/O SHYOJIRAM GURJAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4522/2026 · 2026-03-25
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4260 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4260 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12562] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4522/2026 Mahaveer Gurjar S/o Shyojiram Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Gurjar Mohalla, Rodawas, P.s. Rupangarh, District Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lovesh Mamnani Mr. Priyam Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 25/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.48/2026 registered at Police Station Rupangarh, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 25, 3, 27 of Arms Act, 1959 and Section 109(1) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he fired a gunshot at the injured Kailash. However, a perusal of the FIR itself reveals that there was no intention on the part of the petitioner to cause injury to the said person. It is further submitted that in the present matter, the complainant has moved an application before the trial Court stating that he has no objection to the grant of bail
[2026:RJ-JP:12562] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4522/2026] to the present petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since
13.03.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mahaveer Gurjar S/o Shyojiram Gurjar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/68