IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87251 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Bhola Kumar S/o Harishchandra Yadav R/o Village - Bhaur, P.S - Rajauli, District - Nawada 2. Amit Kumar S/o Amresh Prasad R/o Village - Siro Dabar, P.S - Rajauli, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(5), 111(2), 316(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had secret information that the petitioners and others are involved in committing theft of bikes. On this information police conducted a raid and apprehended Bhola Kumar (petitioner no.1). During interrogation, Bhola Kumar confessed of committing theft of bikes and handed them for sale to Amit Kumar (petitioner no.2). After this, Amit Kumar was apprehended who further admitted that both of them jointly committed theft of bikes, removed their number Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87251 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/3 plates and concealed them in a house. On this information the house of Bipin Kumar of village Chautha was raided, however, Bipin Kumar managed to escape. Two bikes were recovered from the said house and it was later disclosed that the house belongs to Sanoj Yadav. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the case of the prosecution both the petitioners were involved in committing theft of bikes and selling them on low price. After getting clue from petitioner no.1 the house of petitioner no.2 was raided but recovery has been made from the house of a third person. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the story which has been created by the prosecution does not connect itself as the recovery has not been made from any of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has lastly submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 14.08.2025. 5. Learned Additional Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioners and has submitted that petitioner no.1 is having criminal antecedent of four cases and petitioner no.2 is having criminal antecedent of one case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87251 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 3/3 connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 441 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each of them with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T